| 对我国大学评价与排名的量化分析与比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 方海明. 对我国大学评价与排名的量化分析与比较[J]. 高教发展与评估, 2006, 22(1): 20-27 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 方海明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江师范大学发展与改革研究室,浙江,金华,321004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 鉴于广东管理科学研究院、网大(中国)有限公司和中国校友会等机构发布的大学评价与综合排名所产生的广泛影响及争议,笔者运用量化统计的分析方法,选取国内100所大学作为样本,对上述三家机构近年来发布的大学评价与综合排名的情况进行了具体深入的量化分析与比较,并以此为基础分析探讨了三者关于大学评价与综合排名活动的积极作用及明显存在的不足与缺陷。
|
| 关 键 词： | 大学 评价 综合排名 量化分析 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-8742(2006)01-0020-08 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-09-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-09-04 |
A Quantitative Analysis and Comparative Study of Chinese University Evaluation and Rankings |
| |
| Fang Haiming. A Quantitative Analysis and Comparative Study of Chinese University Evaluation and Rankings[J]. higher education development and evaluation, 2006, 22(1): 20-27 |
| |
| Authors: | Fang Haiming |
| |
| Affiliation: | Research Office for Development and Reform ,Zhejiang Normal University, Yinhua 321004, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In view of the extensive influence and controversy aroused by Chinese university evaluation and comprehensive rankings released by such organizations as Guangdong Management Scientific Research Institute,Netbig.com(China) Limited Corporation and China Alumni,selecting 100 domestic universities as samples,the author makes a thorough quantitative analysis and comparative study of the rankings released by the above-mentioned three organizations,adopting the quantitative analysis method.Based on the careful analysis the author further discusses the merits and apparent defects of such evaluation and rankings. |
| |
| Keywords: | university evaluation comprehensive ranking quantitative analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
