考试正当性的三个诉求及其启示

在教育评价中,事实判断涉及的是主体的认识对客体的符合程度,其评价标准在于是否“合理“;价值判断则源于主体的需要并以此衡量客体的满足程度,其标准在于是否“合情“.科学的评价,应该既“合理“又“合情“.然而,我国当前的考试评价研究,多以追求“合理“为主,忽视了“合情“的因素.为此,需要在追溯考试演进的历史和审视考试发展现状过程中,探寻出考试正当性的相关诉求,以期为我国当前的考试实践活动带来一些启示.

Three Demands on the legitimacy of the Examination and Its Implications

In the evaluation of education,the fact judgments relate the extent of the matching that the object understands the subject.And this criteria of evaluation isreasonable.But the value judgement relies on the extent that the subject meets the need of the object and its standard isSensible. So the scientific evaluation should not onlyreasonablebut alsosensible.To this end,it needs to retrospective the evolution history of examination and examines the course of development.In that process,we can explore the rel...