Strategic Responses to Accountability Demands: A Case Study of Three Community Colleges |
| |
Authors: | John B Lattimore Mark M D'Amico Dawson R Hancock |
| |
Institution: | 1. Business and Allied Health, Division of Academic Programs, Cleveland Community College , Shelby , North Carolina , USA lattimorej@clevelandcc.edu;3. Department of Educational Leadership , The University of North Carolina at Charlotte , Charlotte , North Carolina , USA |
| |
Abstract: | As community colleges receive attention focused on their role in addressing postsecondary needs, they are subject to varying levels of accountability, which necessitates the development of strategic approaches to leading institutions. Burke (2005
Burke , J. ( 2005 ). The many faces of accountability . In J. Burke & Associates (Eds.), Achieving accountability in higher education: Balancing public, academic and market demands (pp. 1 – 24 ). San Francisco , CA : Wiley . Google Scholar]) recognizes three accountability perspectives that higher education institutions must consider: market, political, and academic. The strategic planning processes used at three North Carolina community colleges reflect a balanced approach to responding to the accountability requirements of all three perspectives. Using a qualitative multisite case study of the colleges, five themes emerge as implications for practice: (a) Involve stakeholders in strategic planning and implementation; (b) Create a student-centered culture; (c) Provide fiscal accountability with data-driven decision making; (d) Develop a balanced strategic approach to all accountability perspectives; and (e) Integrate regional accreditation principles into strategies. By applying the convergent practices of the three successful colleges, community colleges can create strategic plans to meet the needs of a variety of stakeholders, assert fiscal management, and encourage continuous improvement of programs and processes. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|