| 语法隐喻与认知隐喻的理论比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 毛帅梅.语法隐喻与认知隐喻的理论比较研究[J].南宁师范高等专科学校学报,2006,23(4):75-78. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 毛帅梅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖南工程学院外语外贸系 湖南湘潭411101 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文拟对认知语言学领域的雷科夫认知隐喻理论与系统功能语言学框架下的韩礼德语法隐喻理论作较全面的介绍与比较。在分别讨论这两种隐喻理论各自的哲学基础和语义观后,作者进一步探寻了两个理论的近期发展。旨在通过该比较性的研究,揭示两种理论模式有着多方面的互补性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 语法隐喻 认知隐喻 哲学基础 意义进化理论 百科知识语义观 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-696X（2006）04-0075-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-09-15 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年9月15日 |
Grammatical Metaphor and Cognitive Metaphor: A Comparative Study |
| |
| Mao Shuaimei.Grammatical Metaphor and Cognitive Metaphor: A Comparative Study[J].Journal of Nanning Junior Teachers College,2006,23(4):75-78. |
| |
| Authors: | Mao Shuaimei |
| |
| Institution: | Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan, Hunan Prov,411101,China |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper aims at an introduction and comparison between two approaches to metaphor:G. Lakoffs cognitive metaphor in cognitive linguistics and M.A.K.Halliday's grammatical metaphor within the systemic-functional framework.The author discusses their respective philosophical foundations,semantic viewpoints and further probes into their developments in theory.The comparative study does not serve to judge which mode is superior,but rather make us know to what degree their modes can complement each other. |
| |
| Keywords: | grammatical metaphor cognitive metaphor philosophical foundations evolutionary theory of meaning encyclopedic semantics |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
