首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

混合式课程教学设计质量与倾向的研究——以全国30门获奖混合式课程为例
引用本文:丁妍,范慧慧,苏永康,阿茹娜,刘翼婷.混合式课程教学设计质量与倾向的研究——以全国30门获奖混合式课程为例[J].电化教育研究,2021,42(1):107-114.
作者姓名:丁妍  范慧慧  苏永康  阿茹娜  刘翼婷
作者单位:复旦大学高等教育研究所,上海 200433;复旦大学教师教学发展中心,上海 200433;上海交通大学慕课研究院,上海 200240;复旦大学高等教育研究所,上海 200433;复旦大学研究生院,上海 200433
基金项目:课堂互动的脚手架构建与在线课程质量标准研制";2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"改善混合教学质量的路径研究
摘    要:文章通过混合方法对2019年“全国混合式教学设计创新大赛”30门获奖课程的教学设计进行分析,以阐明我国高校在混合式教学设计上的最新进展、主要问题以及所反映出的教师教学观和设计思维。研究发现,在对标FD-QM在线/混合式课程质量标准上,案例课程的活动和测评设计比较薄弱,具体表现在教师多倾向于增加互动和测试的数量与类型,但对制定教与学活动规则和评价标准则关注不足,反映出教师对混合式教学中如何认识自身角色、实践“教学存在”存在偏差。从根本上说,这是“学生中心”和“教师中心”两种不同教学观相互冲突却又纠葛的关系在教学设计中的集中体现,它提示我们在教学范式转型背景下,探讨教与学关系、师生权力、学习责任等根本性问题变得愈发重要。

关 键 词:混合式课程  教学设计  在线课程质量标准  学生中心  教师中心

A Study on the Quality and Tendency of Blended Course Design: Taking the 30 National Award-winning Blended Courses as the Cases
DING Yan,FAN Huihui,SU Yongkang,Aruna,LIU Yiting.A Study on the Quality and Tendency of Blended Course Design: Taking the 30 National Award-winning Blended Courses as the Cases[J].E-education Research,2021,42(1):107-114.
Authors:DING Yan  FAN Huihui  SU Yongkang  Aruna  LIU Yiting
Institution:(The Research Institute for Higher Education,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433;The Center for Faculty Development,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433;MOOC Research Institute,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200240;The Graduate School,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433)
Abstract:This paper analyzes the instructional design of 30 prize-winning courses in 2019 National Hybrid Instructional Design Innovation Competition by means of mixed methods,in order to explain the latest progress and major issues in blended instructional design in Chinese universities,and the teachers'teaching outlook and design thinking reflected by them.The research finds that the design of activities and assessments in case studies is relatively weak according to the quality standards of FD-QM online/hybrid courses.Specifically,teachers tend to increase the number and types of interactions and tests,but pay less attention to developing rules and assessment criteria for teaching and learning activities,which reflects a bias in how teachers perceive their roles and practice their'teaching presence'in blended learning.In essence,this is a reflection of the conflicting and entangled relationship between two different views of teaching and learning:"student-centeredness"and"teacher-centeredness".It suggests that in the context of a paradigm shift in teaching and learning,it has become increasingly important to explore the fundamental issues such as the relationship between teaching and learning,the power of teachers and students,and the responsibility of learning.
Keywords:Blended Course  Instructional Design  Online Course Quality Standards  Student-centeredness  Teacher-centeredness
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号