首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

世代累积型集体创作说释疑——与纪德君教授商榷
引用本文:周明初. 世代累积型集体创作说释疑——与纪德君教授商榷[J]. 南京师范大学文学院学报, 2007, 4(3): 138-145
作者姓名:周明初
作者单位:浙江大学,人文学院,中文系,浙江,杭州,310028
摘    要:本文是对纪德君教授《世代累积型集体创作说献疑》的回应。本文认为徐朔方先生的世代累积型集体创作说并没有如纪文所说"在很大程度上贬低了作家个体独特的创造性劳动,并进而没收了罗贯中等人的著作权",并非是与"对‘进化论’、‘人民群众是历史的创造者’等理论观点的片面认识有关",而是与他熟悉中外文学,能以西方文学为参照,注重中外文学的比较有关。本文还对纪文在明代"四大奇书"研究方面对徐先生的批评提出辩驳。

关 键 词:世代累积型作品  集体创作  个人创作
文章编号:1008-9853(2007)03-138-08
修稿时间:2007-04-20

An Explanation to the Doctrine of Collective Creative Work Passing on from Generation to Generation——To Discuss with Prof. Ji Dejun
Zhou Mingchu. An Explanation to the Doctrine of Collective Creative Work Passing on from Generation to Generation——To Discuss with Prof. Ji Dejun[J]. Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University, 2007, 4(3): 138-145
Authors:Zhou Mingchu
Affiliation:Zhou Mingchu
Abstract:The article is an answer to "Some Questions to the Doctrine of Collective Creative Work Passing on from Generation to Generation" written by Prof.Ji Dejun.The article points out that Mr.Xu Shuofang's doctrine of collective creative work passing on from generation to generation does not "underestimate the personal creative work greatly,or cancel the copyright of Luo Guanzhong".The doctrine is not related to "one-sidedness in understanding the theories including 'the evolutionism' and 'history if created by the mass of people'.It is based on the factors that Mr.Xu Shuofang was well acquainted with Chinese and foreign literature,he referred to the west literature and placed a special emphasis on comparison between Chinese literature and foreign literature.Moreover,aiming at the criticism on Mr.Xu Shuofang's researches of "Four Remarkable Book" in the Ming Dynasty,the article gives a refutation.
Keywords:the work passing on from generation to generation  collective creative work  personal creative work
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号