首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

大学英语“精读”词汇教学方式的分组效果分析
引用本文:陈阳芳. 大学英语“精读”词汇教学方式的分组效果分析[J]. 哈尔滨学院学报, 2012, 33(7): 72-75
作者姓名:陈阳芳
作者单位:梧州学院外语系,广西梧州,543002
摘    要:文章以梧州学院数理系学生为对象开展词汇教学方式准实验研究。按词汇测试成绩把受试分为低、中、高分组,分别用与平均分最为或较为相关的三个生词的词义测试成绩代表讲授/不讲授"精读"外词义及解释/不解释词义联系的词义教学效果,采用两个相关样本非参数McNemar检验对三组受试的三组成绩进行两两检验。结果显示:讲授"精读"外词义显著促进高分组"精读"词义学习;解释词义联系不能显著促进所有组别的"精读"词义学习。

关 键 词:大学英语“精读”  词汇教学  一词多义  认知语言学

An Analysis of Effects of Textual Vocabulary Teaching Modes to Low, Middle and High Grade Groups
CHEN Yang-fang. An Analysis of Effects of Textual Vocabulary Teaching Modes to Low, Middle and High Grade Groups[J]. Journal of Harbin University, 2012, 33(7): 72-75
Authors:CHEN Yang-fang
Affiliation:CHEN Yang-fang(Wuzhou College,Wuzhou 543002,China)
Abstract:A quasi-experiment on vocabulary teaching modes is carried out with the students in the Math and Physics Department of Wuzhou University as subjects.Subjects are grouped into low,middle and high grades according to their scores in a vocabulary test.Their achievements in learning three new words,which are the most or relatively related to the mean scores,represents the teaching effects of teaching or not teaching an meaning unrelated to the text and explaining or not explaining the sense relationships.McNemar Nonparametric Test of Two Related-Samples is adopted to analyze the three data samples of each subject group.The result shows:teaching the lexical meaning unrelated to the text significantly promoted the learning of the textual meaning,while explaining sense relationship did not significantly enhance the learning of lexical meaning in text.
Keywords:intensive reading of college English  vocabulary teaching and learning  polyse- my  cognitive linguistics
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《哈尔滨学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号