首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

交通肇事逃逸案件犯罪转化研究
引用本文:朱锡平.交通肇事逃逸案件犯罪转化研究[J].江苏广播电视大学学报,2008,19(1):75-78.
作者姓名:朱锡平
作者单位:南京市下关区人民法院,江苏,南京,210011
摘    要:对行为人肇事逃逸后出现被害人死亡的实害后果,应定性为交通肇事逃逸还是故意杀人罪,在审判实践中存在一定的分歧。以对大陆法系等价值性理论和对最高法院司法解释的认知为基础,对"单纯逃逸"和"移动逃逸"进行了分类分析,单纯逃逸致人死亡并不必然得出故意杀人的结论,关键在于对排他性支配力的判断。

关 键 词:交通肇事罪  等价值  单纯逃逸  移动逃逸
文章编号:1008-4207(2008)01-0075-04
收稿时间:2007-06-16
修稿时间:2007年6月16日

A Study on Crime Transition of Hit-and-Run Cases
ZHU Xi-ping.A Study on Crime Transition of Hit-and-Run Cases[J].Journal of Jiangsu Radio & Television University,2008,19(1):75-78.
Authors:ZHU Xi-ping
Abstract:There exist some divergences in the judgment practice that whether the actual damage resulting from death caused to the victim after the hit-and-run by the actor shall be determined to be the crime of hit-and-run or the crime of intentional homicide.On the ground of the equal value theory of the continental law system and perception of the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court,it classifies and analyzes the "simplex absconding" and "moving displacement absconding",and comes to the conclusion that death caused by simplex absconding does not inevitably result in the intentional homicide,while the key is the judgment of the exclusive power.
Keywords:hit-and-run  equal value  simplex absconding  moving displacement absconding
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号