The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands;2. Open University of the Netherlands, The Netherlands;3. Utrecht University, The Netherlands;4. Maastricht University, The Netherlands;1. Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, 1795 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;2. Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California, Department of Radiology, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;3. Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California, Department of Neurology, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;4. Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California, Department of Neurosurgery, 1500 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA;1. Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia;2. School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom;3. Teaching Innovation Unit and School of Education, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia;4. School of Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA;5. Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark |
| |
| Abstract: | CSCL research has given rise to a plethora of analysis methods, all with specific analysis goals, units of analysis, and for specific types of data (chat, threaded discussions, etc.). This article describes some challenges of CSCL-analysis. The development of an analysis method for negotiation processes in multidisciplinary teams serves as an example of how these challenges occur in practice. Results reveal a number of tensions with regard to establishing reliable coding procedures without compromising validity, such as how to define codes, and rules for applying codes. The discussion offers some guidelines for content analysis of CSCL-data. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
