| 类比法与归谬法的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 盛新华,卢芸蓉. 类比法与归谬法的比较研究[J]. 河池学院学报, 2006, 26(6): 23-27 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 盛新华 卢芸蓉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湘潭大学,文学与新闻学院,湖南,湘潭,411105;湘潭大学,文学与新闻学院,湖南,湘潭,411105 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 类比法与归谬法是两种既有联系又有区别的逻辑推理方法。它们之间在构成的心理基础、客观依据以及论证模式、借助手法等方面相同;在建构方法的复杂程度、语用效果、语用策略、语用风格等方面有区别。区分类比法与归谬法的同异,目的在于在论证中更好地运用这两种方法,使论证更具有说服力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 类比法 归谬法 相同 相异 论证 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-9021(2006)06-0023-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-10-25 |
The Study of Compare between Analogism and Induction to Absurdity |
| |
| SHENG Xin-hua,LU Yun-rong. The Study of Compare between Analogism and Induction to Absurdity[J]. Journal of Hechi University, 2006, 26(6): 23-27 |
| |
| Authors: | SHENG Xin-hua LU Yun-rong |
| |
| Abstract: | Analogism and induction to absurdity are two kind logic inference and between them there are some connection and difference. The same between them are the psychological ground of compose, objective foundation, argument model and skill of drawing support from other; the difference between them are the complex in degree of form method, pragmatic effect, pragmatic strategy and language style. Distinguishing them is to use them better in argumentation and to be more forceful in persuasion. |
| |
| Keywords: | analogism induction to absurdity similarities differences argumentation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
