首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

客观真实与法律真实浅析--以我国刑事诉讼法"案件事实"为视角的分析
引用本文:彭丹. 客观真实与法律真实浅析--以我国刑事诉讼法"案件事实"为视角的分析[J]. 培训与研究, 2004, 21(1): 55-57
作者姓名:彭丹
作者单位:武汉大学法学院 武汉
摘    要:目前刑事诉讼法学界在证明标准问题上存在着“客观真实”与“法律真实”的争论。本文从认识论、价值取向与现实分析三个角度对刑事诉讼的证明标准问题进行论述,认为“客观真实”观存在诸多的不合理之处,而“法律真实”观既符合辩证唯物主义认识论的基本原理,又符合我国当前主流诉讼价值观的要求。因此应提倡以“法律真实”作为我国刑事诉讼的证明标准。

关 键 词:刑事诉讼  证明标准  客观真实  法律真实
文章编号:1007-1687(2004)01-0055-03
修稿时间:2003-09-20

An Analysis of the Proof Standard in the Criminal Procedure
PENG Dan. An Analysis of the Proof Standard in the Criminal Procedure[J]. Training and Research-Journal of Hubei College of Education, 2004, 21(1): 55-57
Authors:PENG Dan
Abstract:At present, controversy on the issue that whether the proof standard should be objective truth or legal truth exists in the criminal procedure. This thesis discusses this issue from three angles of epistemology, value tropism and actual analysis, and tries to make out the conclusion that the long - terra dominant objective truth is not that reasonable in many aspects while the legal truth accords with not only the fundamental theory of the dialect material epistemology but also the present requirement of dominant procedural value in our country. Thus, the author advocates that legal truth be the proof standard on criminal procedure.
Keywords:criminal procedure   proof standard   objective truth   legal truth
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号