首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

剥削与正义——“分析马克思主义”的理论分歧及问题辨析
引用本文:曹玉涛.剥削与正义——“分析马克思主义”的理论分歧及问题辨析[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2007,36(4):17-20.
作者姓名:曹玉涛
作者单位:洛阳师范学院,政法学院,河南,洛阳,471022
摘    要:分析马克思主义是一股新兴的西方马克思主义哲学思潮,其关于剥削是否正义的争论在西方哲学界引起了很大轰动,也造成了极大混乱.分析马克思主义的伍德一派主张马克思反对正义,肯定资本主义剥削的正义性.而胡萨米一派则认为马克思赞成正义,批判资本主义剥削的非正义.二者争论的实质在于没有理解马克思评价社会历史的两个尺度及其辩证关系.

关 键 词:剥削  正义  历史尺度  价值尺度  非正义  分析马克思主义  理论分歧  问题辨析  Justice  Exploitation  Analytical  辩证关系  尺度  历史  社会  评价  理解马克思  胡萨米  正义性  资本主义  伍德  哲学界  西方马克思主义  哲学思潮
文章编号:1000-2529(2007)04-0017-04
修稿时间:2007-03-20

Exploitation and Justice——Disagreement and Arguments Among Analytical Marxists
CAO Yu-tao.Exploitation and Justice——Disagreement and Arguments Among Analytical Marxists[J].Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University,2007,36(4):17-20.
Authors:CAO Yu-tao
Institution:School of Politics and Law, Luoyang Normal College, Luoyang, Henan 471022, China
Abstract:Analytical Marxism is a new trend of west Marxist philosophy.its debate whether exploitation is justice or not cause a great sensation and bring about great confuse.Wood,an analytical Marxist,argues that Marx opposes justice, and affirms that capitalism exploitation is just.However,Husami,another analytical Marxist,thinks that Marx is in favor of justice and criticizes capitalism exploitation's injustice.The essence of their arguements is that neither of them understand Marx's two measures of evaluation of society and history,nor understand dialectical relation between them.
Keywords:exploitation  justice  measure of society  measure of value
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号