| Abstract: | In this article, I analyse the  publish or perish enterprise and in particular the origins of editorial power/knowledge. My actor-network analysis shows how tenure, promotion, and salary decisions apparently unrelated to editorial decisions are important elements that accrue power/knowledge to editors of particular journals. What my actor-network analysis does not show, and which I therefore analyse from a subject-centred perspective, is the other side of editorial power/knowledge: authorial suffering. I suggest that the structure of our science education discipline necessitates a particular commitment to the responsibilities and obligations of editors and reviewers to the authors, particularly the newcomers, and therefore to the production and reproduction of science education. |
