道势相依:关于书院制度盛衰循环内在脉络的探讨

书院教育制度作为中国教育史上的一朵奇葩，其发展经历了几度盛衰循环，体现出“以道抗势”与“以道附势”的双重性格。表面上看，“以道抗势”体现出“道”“势”的矛盾冲突，但实质上，由于“以道抗势”蕴涵的“道”“势”对立并不是“势”与“非势”的对立，而是此“势”与彼“势”的对立，即书院所倡导的理想之“势”与现实之“势”的对立，因此，“道”“势”是内在相依且可以转化的。“道”“势”相依既构成书院制度发展的内在脉络，也使得书院制度具有无法摆脱的依附性。

Interdependence Between Tao and Power:An Analysis on the Interent Rule in the Circle of Ups and Downs of the System of Academy of Classical Learning

As an unusual phenomenon in the history of Chinese higher education, the system of academy of classical learning developed in the circle process of ups and downs, and embodied the double characteristic what is that Tao's resistance to Power and Tao's dependent on Power. It seems that there is conflict between Tao and Power. However, the central point at issue is that Tao is opposite to Power is not confrontation between Power and Non-power but confrontation between this Power and that Power. There was interdependent between Tao and Power, and they could change from each other. The inner identity of the system of academy of classical learning is that Tao couldn't be separated from Power, and that is the crux of the system of academy of classical learning couldn't get rid of the adjunct character.