The impact of new public management instruments on PhD education |
| |
Authors: | Peter Schneider and Dieter Sadowski |
| |
Institution: | (1) Institute for Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the EU (IAAEG), University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | New public governance emphasises less state, more market and more hierarchy as the cornerstones for effective steering of
higher education institutions. Based on an explorative analysis of qualitative and quantitative data of fourteen German and
European economics departments, we investigate the steering effects of six new public management instruments in the years
2001 and 2002 on subsequent placement success of PhD graduates. Using crisp set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to analyse
the data, our results deliver strong support for the positive effects of competition for resources and the varying effects
of hierarchy on PhD education. Governance of successful departments is characterised by two solutions: transparency over academic achievements as one single success factor in each solution or a combination of additional
funding based on national competitive performance with either no
public policy regulations for departments or no
university regulations for departments. Governance of unsuccessful departments is characterised by one solution: university
regulations for departments or a combination of no
additional
funding based on national
competitive performance and no
transparency over academic achievements. Our results strengthen the strong impact of selected competitive mechanisms as an effective governance instrument and the
partially detrimental effects of state regulations. University regulations turn out to be successful if they increase transparency
over academic achievements by faculty members. Success is unlikely if those rules intervene into PhD education. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|