首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

消费者权益保护视野下的“寄存”之辩
引用本文:金健.消费者权益保护视野下的“寄存”之辩[J].嘉应学院学报,2011,29(12):60-64.
作者姓名:金健
作者单位:南京大学法学院,南京,210093
摘    要:消费者使用超市的自助寄存柜存物时,与超市形成的是借用合同关系。如果消费者存入自助寄存柜内的物品丢失,超市的责任应当分情况讨论。为此,需要依次回答下列问题:超市要求消费者在进入购物区之前存包,是否侵犯消费者之合法权益?保管合同、借用合同与租赁合同关系的异同对法律关系的影响值得注意。超市的注意义务之必要性的具体内容是对于消费者的人身财产安全。

关 键 词:寄存  借用合同  保管合同  保护限度

Doubt on the Storage in the Field of Protection of Consumer Rights
JIN Jian.Doubt on the Storage in the Field of Protection of Consumer Rights[J].Journal of Jiaying University,2011,29(12):60-64.
Authors:JIN Jian
Institution:JIN Jian(Law School,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)
Abstract:What is legal relationship between the consumers and the supermarket when consumers use self-storage container? It is the borrowings contract.If the property put into self-storage cabinet is lost,is the supermarket liable? It should be discussed in different conditions.We need to answer the following questions: is it an infringement of rights and interests of consumers when supermarkets require consumers to save shopping bags before entering the shopping area? What kind of the relationship is it between the supermarket and consumers,contract for borrowings,deposit contract,or the leasing contractual relationship? It is vital to the judgment of the case.What is the specific content of the duty to care of supermarkets? To protect personal security and property of consumers is the aim.
Keywords:borrowing contract  deposit contract  leasing contract  reasonable protection limits
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号