五代宋初天台教籍复归中土问题的再检讨

在五代、宋初天台教籍复归中土的问题上，“遣使日本”说既确乎有据，“遣使高丽”说亦难以否认，那么，最有可能的大概还是往日本、高丽两国皆曾遣使求取天台教籍。至于遣使求籍及教籍复归的时间，或如何勇强氏所言，吴越求经日本是在汉、周之际．而求经高丽则是在宋朝初年。此外，如木宫泰彦等学所指出的那样，在宋初之后，随着中国与高丽、日本的贸易往来和化交流．亦陆续有包括天台教典在内的佛教典籍自高丽、日本复归中土。不过，那多半是吴越亡国之后的事了。在天台教籍复还中国一事上，史料对义寂、德韶及吴越王钱俶三人所起作用的记述也并不是完全一致的，这一点亦应引起我们的注意。

Discussion of the Problem which the Books and Records of Tiantaijao Returned to the Centre Mainland in Five Dynasties and the Eearly Song Dynasty

Perhaps messengers were sent to Japan and Gaoli to get the books and records of Tiantaijiao as far as the problem which the books and records of Tiantaijiao returned to the centre mainland in five dynasties and the early song Dynasty.With the trading and culture intercourse between China and Gaoli,Japan,Buddhism books and records including the books and records of Tiantaijiao returned to the centre main land from Gaoli and Japan in succession.The accounts in historic materials about Yiji,Deshao and Qianshu,the king of Wuyue were not completely unanimous on the problem which the books and records of Tiantai jiao returned to China.