首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors
Institution:1. Institute for Psychology of Learning and Instruction at Kiel University, Olshausenstraße 75, D-24118 Kiel, Germany;2. Institute of Biology Education at the University of Cologne, Herbert-Lewin-Straße 10, D-50931 Cologne, Germany;3. Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (IPN) at Kiel University, Olshausenstraße 62, D-24118 Kiel, Germany;1. Linguistics Department, Allameh Tabataba’i university, Tehran, 1997967556, Iran;2. English Department,Ministry of Education,Marand, East Azerbaijan,Iran;3. English Department,Ministry of Education,Urmia,West Azerbaijan, Iran
Abstract:There is a growing body of research on teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), yet most of it has focused on subject-matter-bounded (specific) PCK and involves teachers in the general classroom (elementary and secondary grades). This study explorers the kinds of interpretative frameworks that university professors use in constructing and implementing PCK. The basic purpose of this study was to better understand the “generic” nature of PCK among exceptional university-level teachers. It analyzes generic PCK in professors across several fields (biology, business, education, kinesiology, music, nursing, special education, and speech communication). Data were obtained from phenomenological interviews with 10 university professors, all of them experienced teachers and recognized by their peers and administrators as eminent. The results emerged from qualitative analysis of the data, and indicate that these professors not only construct and use generic PCK in very similar ways but also that they apply generic PCK in ways that reflect Rubin's (1989) notion of “pedagogical intelligence” and Porter and Brophy's (1988) insights on good teaching. Five generic PCK components emerged: knowledge about (a) the subject matter, (b) the students, (c) numerous instructional strategies, (d) the teaching context, and (e) one's teaching purposes. In addition, the results problematize the traditional “scholar-teacher” dichotomy in higher education.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号