首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论文学优劣的标准——兼与陈思和等关于《兄弟》的商榷
引用本文:吴夜. 论文学优劣的标准——兼与陈思和等关于《兄弟》的商榷[J]. 孝感职业技术学院学报, 2007, 10(4): 30-33
作者姓名:吴夜
作者单位:安徽大学中文系 安徽合肥230039
摘    要:余华长篇小说《兄弟》出版以来,受到评论界诸多指责。但陈思和等从民间视角出发得出截然相反的论断。文章认为,一部杰出的现实主义作品必须在形式创造、人物塑造、思想内涵上达到一定高度,而《兄弟》在以上方面均存在严重缺陷。作品的解读是多元的,但并不能因此改变评价其优劣的客观标准。如果任意为之,只能导致黑白颠倒、是非混淆。

关 键 词:《兄弟》  形式创造  人物塑造  思想内涵
文章编号:1671-8178(2007)04-0030-04
收稿时间:2007-09-28
修稿时间:2007-09-28

On Assessment Standard of Literature Works——Discussions about Brothers with Chen Sihe and others
WU Ye. On Assessment Standard of Literature Works——Discussions about Brothers with Chen Sihe and others[J]. Journal of Xiaogan Vocational-Technical College, 2007, 10(4): 30-33
Authors:WU Ye
Affiliation:Literature School, Anhui University Hefei, Anhui 230039
Abstract:It has received many critics in comment circles since Yuhua's novel Brothers was published.But in view of folks,Chen Sihe drew an obviously reverse conclusion.The author of this article thinks that an excellent work of realism should reach a high level in form creation,character depicting and connotation.There exist many limitations on the above aspects in Brothers.A work can be understood in many ways,but the assessment standard should not be changed because of this.If a work is freely understood,it will bring confusion.
Keywords:Brothers  Form Creation  Character Depicting  Connotation.
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号