首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

浅析我国刑法中的违法性认识问题
引用本文:管晓翼.浅析我国刑法中的违法性认识问题[J].巢湖学院学报,2016(4):34-38.
作者姓名:管晓翼
作者单位:安徽财经大学,安徽 蚌埠,233000
摘    要:1997年刑法典中没有规定违法性认识,而是采用“社会危害性”的概念,这在很大程度上是为了适应当时打击犯罪的刑罚理念。随着人权保障条款入宪及刑事司法观念的转变,使我们不得不面临违法性认识要与不要的理论争议及司法处理难题。重新对违法性认识的概念、内涵进行厘定,并对两大法系的不同处理方式进行梳理,借鉴其立法上予以规定、司法上符合情理的解释方法。客观分析我国刑法适用中违法性认识与社会危害性认识、犯罪故意间的理论混乱、司法界定模糊的情况,提出有限度地引入违法性认识理论,将违法性认识作为犯罪故意的认定要素之一,并进一步提出推定的认定方法予以解决。

关 键 词:违法性认识  社会危害性认识  犯罪故意  违法性认识推定

A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEMS ON ILLEGALITY COGNITION IN CRIMINAL LAWS IN CHINA
Abstract:In the Penal Code of 1997, illegality cognition is not regulated and instead the concept of“social danger”is adopted, which is to a large extent for adapting the penalty idea of combating crimes. Along with the human rights guaranteed in the constitution and the transformation of criminal justice, we have had to face the theoretical disputes and judicial problems whether we should have the illegality cognition. It is very important to reassure the connotation and the concept of illegality cognition, sort out the different approaches of the two legal systems, and learn from its reasonable legislative, judicial explana-tion. The thesis objectively analyzed the illegality and harmfulness cognition in our criminal law, theoretical confusion between the criminal intent, fuzzy judicial definitions, proposed a limited introduction of illegal cognition theory, meanwhile regarded il-legality as one of the elements of criminal intention, and further put forward the way to solve them.
Keywords:Illegality cognition  Harmfulness cognition  Criminal intent  Presumption of illegality cognition
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号