| 困境与出路：我国档案犯罪实体性行刑衔接制度之思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谷永超. 困境与出路：我国档案犯罪实体性行刑衔接制度之思考[J]. 档案学研究, 2018, 32(5): 23-26. DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.05.005 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谷永超 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南大学犯罪控制与刑事政策研究所 河南开封 475001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文为天津市哲学社会科学规划项目“美国刑法中的罪刑法定原则研究”（项目编号：TJFXQN17-004）的阶段性研究成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《档案法》与《刑法》组成了我国档案安全的法律保护体系,但“二法”在实体性衔接上存在衔接断层的问题。目前,“二法”在客体、主体、客观方面及法律后果等方面仍然存在衔接断层的地方,需要通过修改档案犯罪所在小节的罪名、扩展档案犯罪规制的行为类型、扩大档案犯罪保护对象的范围和拓展档案犯罪的主体范围对“二法”的实体性衔接进行建构。
|
Dilemma and Outlet: the Substantive Linking between Archive law and Criminal law of China Archival Crime |
| |
| Yongchao GU. Dilemma and Outlet: the Substantive Linking between Archive law and Criminal law of China Archival Crime[J]. Archives Science Study, 2018, 32(5): 23-26. DOI: 10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2018.05.005 |
| |
| Authors: | Yongchao GU |
| |
| Abstract: | Archives law and criminal law constitute the legal protection system of our country archives security, but there are some problems in the substantive linking between them, such as: lack of linking at object, subject, objective aspects and legal consequence etc. So we need to reconstruct the substantive linking between them through revising the chapter definition of archive crime, enlarge the scope of action, expand the scope of crime target and expand the scope of the crime subject. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《档案学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《档案学研究》下载全文 |
