首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

心理教育≠道德教育:一种德育学辩护
引用本文:唐爱民. 心理教育≠道德教育:一种德育学辩护[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2005, 7(3): 87-90
作者姓名:唐爱民
作者单位:曲阜师范大学,教科院,山东,曲阜,273165
摘    要:心理教育不等于道德教育。二在目标指向、理论依据、运行机制、工作方式诸方面存在重大差异。若将心理教育放大至道德教育或以心理教育取替道德教育,定然遭致德育含义的扩展、外延的膨胀与泛化等结局,从而降低德育的实效;不独如此,这种观念与做法还极易使人错解心理教育的原旨,委弃其要旨,从而带来不必要的理论视差。将心理教育混同于道德教育,从深层追究,其实是混淆了非道德范畴与道德范畴的界限,潜存着德育泛化的危险,势必给心理教育与道德教育同时带来损害。

关 键 词:心理教育 道德教育 非道德范畴 德育学辩护
文章编号:1009-413X(2005)03-0087-04
修稿时间:2004-04-13

Psychology is not ethics:a defense of ethical theory
TANG Ai-min. Psychology is not ethics:a defense of ethical theory[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University, 2005, 7(3): 87-90
Authors:TANG Ai-min
Abstract:The writer of the paperargues that psychology does not equal moral education, and that there are significant differences in perspectives of objective orientations, theoretical basis, and operational mechanisms. However, should the psychology be over-exaggerated as parallel to, or to replace moral education, it would lead to the over-extension of implications of moral education, whose effect, in turn, would be diminished. This misleading concept might further help indulge in mistaking the true meaning of psychology for being much too easy, with a consequence of the theoretical parallax. Therefore, the writer concludes that the confusion of psychology with moral education is confusion of ethic norms and immoralism, so to speak. And it will impair psychology and moral education at the same time.
Keywords:psychology  moral education  immoralism  defense  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号