首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Adaptive governance and decentralization: Evidence from regulation of the sharing economy in multi-level governance
Institution:1. Center for Technology in Government, SUNY Albany, 187 Wolf Rd., Suite 301, Albany, NY 12205, United States;2. Institute of Public Administration, Information Technology Sector, P O Box 205, Riyadh 11141, Saudi Arabia;1. Catedrático de Economía Financiera y Contabilidad, Universidad de Huelva, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales, Plaza de La Merced 11, 21002 Huelva, Spain;2. Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Faculty of Business, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, Ctra. de Utrera, 1, 41013 Seville, Spain;1. Information Systems Group, Business School, University of Colorado Denver, United States;2. Department of Management, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Bangalore 560035, Karnataka, India;3. Department of Information Systems Decision Sciences, Muma College of Business, University of South Florida, FL, United States;4. Department of ISCS, COB, University of Texas at San Antonio, TX, United States;1. School of Computing and Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia;2. Department of Public Administration, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 W. César E. Chávez Boulevard, San Antonio, TX 78207-4415, USA
Abstract:When does decentralization lead to adaptive governance? This study proposes a conceptual framework of the necessary conditions in which decentralization may result in adaptive governance. We thereby consider two distinct forms in the context of multi-level democratic governance: central and local governments. Based on prior findings that local governments are more sensitive to democratic influences than central ones, we point out that decentralization may hinder the process of adaptation if the considered policy embodies entrepreneurial politics (i.e., if the adaptation generates widely distributed benefits but narrowly concentrated costs). To support our analyses, we use the example of the recent rise of the sharing economy, as manifested by Airbnb, and present qualitative evidence suggesting that higher-tier (central or federal) governments are relatively more favorable to such sharing services than lower-tier (local or city) governments.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号