首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国采光权诉讼司法审查标准刍议
引用本文:陈骏.我国采光权诉讼司法审查标准刍议[J].宁波广播电视大学学报,2013(4):53-57.
作者姓名:陈骏
作者单位:温岭市人民法院,浙江温岭317500
摘    要:采光权行政诉讼具有证据技术性、专业性强,法律法规内容冲突,法定程序缺失,自由裁量空间大等特性,使法院在运用既有司法审查标准过程中产生困惑。对此,应坚持区分类别的司法审查标准,即对于事实问题,采用合理性审查标准,一般情况下尊重行政部门依据技术标准做出的事实认定;对于法律问题,采用正确性审查标准,审查具体行政行为是否用了无效或错误的技术标准;对于程序问题,采用正当程序审查标准,确保当事人采光权得到充分救济。

关 键 词:采光权诉讼  司法审查标准  合理性审查标准  正确性审查标准  正当程序审查标准

On Standards of Judicial Review in Lighting Rights Lawsuit in China
CHEN Jun.On Standards of Judicial Review in Lighting Rights Lawsuit in China[J].Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University,2013(4):53-57.
Authors:CHEN Jun
Institution:CHEN Jun ( Wenling People's Court, Wenling 317500, Zhejiang, China)
Abstract:The lighting rights administrative lawsuit has some characteristics, such as, the evidence itself containing more professional knowledge and technology, conflicts between laws and regulations, lack of legal procedures and large discretionary space, which causes confusions in applying the existing standards of judicial review process produces in Courts. Therefore, we should apply different judicial review standards to different categories of lawsuits, standard of reasonableness review for Factual Issues, standard of correctness review for Legal Issues and standard of due process review for Procedural issues.
Keywords:Lighting fights lawsuit  Standard ofjudicial review  Standard of reasonableness review  Standard of correctnessreview  Standard of due process review
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号