Google学术计量中文期刊H5指数和H5中位数再评价研究

本文以2012年和2015年Google学术计量h指数排名前100名的中文期刊为来源数据库，通过R语言测评了Google学术计量h5指数，h5中位数和CNKI期刊h5指数，h5中位数的相关性，分析了2015年Google学术计量h指数的新变化，以了解Google和CNKI期刊h指数之间的差异和联系。统计结果表明：2015年版Google所有期刊h5指数和CNKI期刊h5指数呈线性相关，Google期刊h指数收录范围有所增加，但仍存在h指数值偏低，h指数值过于集中等问题。

Re-evaluating Chinese Journal H5 and H5 Median of Google Scholar Metrics

In this study,the paper analyzed the correlation between Google Scholar Metrics(GSM) and CNKI Chinese Journal h index in 2015.The paper compared the new features between Google Scholar Metrics(GSM) and CNKI TOP 100 Chinese Journal h index.The statistical results showed that the Google h index increased and the scope of Google scholar has expanded.But for the same publication,most of the Google publications h indexes were still lower than CNKI publications h index.