首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Validity and Reliability of a Shortened,Revised Version of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES)
Authors:Johnson  Bruce  McClure  Robert
Institution:(1) University of Arizona, Education 719, PO Box 210069, Tucson, AZ 85721-0069, USA;(2) St. Mary's University of Minnesota, 8 Roger Bacon Center – Saint Theresa Campus, 700 Terrace Heights, #76, Winona, MN 55987, USA
Abstract:The purpose of the study was to investigate the use of an existing instrument, the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES)(Taylor, Dawson & Fraser, 1995; Taylor, Fraser & Fisher, 1993, 1997), for providing insights into the classroom learning environments of beginning science teachers. In the first year of the study, the CLES was used with 290 upper elementary, middle, and high school science teachers and preservice teachers. As part of a larger study of the classroom environments and teaching practices of beginning science teachers, data also were gathered through classroom observations of and interviews with some of the participating teachers. Exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency reliability analysis, as well as examination of each item and of participants' questions and comments about them, led to a shortened, revised version of the CLES, named the CLES 2(20). The five original scales were retained, but the number of items in each scale was reduced from six to four. The single negatively worded item was eliminated. Some of the original items were rephrased. The revised CLES was then used in the second, third and fourth years of the study. Examples of feedback based on CLES data is provided to researchers to assist them in writing teacher profiles.
Keywords:beginning science teachers  classroom learning environment  Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES)  exploratory factor analysis  internal consistency reliability  teacher perceptions
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号