Using the Critical Thinking Belief Appraisal to assess the rigor gap |
| |
Authors: | Bruce Torff |
| |
Institution: | (1) Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In a line of research employing a survey instrument, the Critical Thinking Belief Appraisal, teachers supported critical-thinking (CT) activities more for high- than low-advantage learners, likely exacerbating a “rigor
gap” implicated in persistent achievement gaps. Such beliefs were less likely to be espoused by expert teachers than randomly
selected ones, and teacher-education programs mitigated these beliefs but did not expunge them, suggesting a need for interventions
that foster belief change. Six issues were found to be associated with support for low-CT activities with low-advantage populations—learners’
prior knowledge, time constraints, influence of parents, influence of colleagues, learners’ level of motivation, and learners’
level of ability. The rigor gap may be ameliorated through teacher-education practices that encourage teachers to (a) reflect
on their existing beliefs, their experiences as students, their field experiences, classroom scenarios, and models of best
practice, and (b) create instructional plans featuring high-CT activities for low-advantage learners. |
| |
Keywords: | Critical thinking Teachers’ beliefs Achievement gap |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|