UK university part-time higher education: a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of undergraduate prospectuses |
| |
Authors: | Adam Matthews Ben Kotzee |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK a.matthews.3@bham.ac.ukhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-0232;3. School of Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-6368 |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACT In the UK, higher education (HE) policy discourse over the past 60 years has advocated flexible part-time HE for social mobility, personal development, economic advantage and leisure. However, part-time undergraduate HE in the UK is in steep decline. Against this backdrop, we were interested in how universities promote, or fail to promote, part-time study options today. We built a corpus of 90 UK undergraduate prospectuses for 2018 entry (5,673,799 words). Using a corpus-assisted discourse analysis approach, we found significant mismatch between policy discourse and marketing discourse regarding part-time study. In particular, we found that UK university marketing discourse positions full-time study as the dominant mode of study and writes of part-time study as ‘second-best’. This discourse mismatch is particularly marked when it comes to the elite Russell Group of universities. Viewing the absence of strong promotional discourse relating to part-time study alongside other factors such as increased tuition fees and the rise of global online education platforms adds a new perspective to the decline of flexible part-time undergraduate HE at campus-based universities in the UK. |
| |
Keywords: | Higher education policy discourse analysis democracy online education |
|
|