首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Consistency and moral integrity: A self-determination theory perspective
Authors:Alexios Arvanitis  Konstantinos Kalliris
Institution:1. Department of Psychology, University of Crete , Rethymno, Greece a.arvanitis@uoc.grORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3379-0286;3. Leicester De Montfort Law School, De Montfort University , Leicester, UK ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-1681
Abstract:ABSTRACT

If acting morally can be viewed as acting consistently with a moral principle or rule, then being a person with moral integrity can be viewed as consistently applying moral principles or rules across different types of situations. We advance a view of moral integrity that incorporates three distinct, but interrelated, types of moral consistency: cognitive, emotional and motivational moral consistency. Our approach is based on Self-Determination Theory, a motivational theory that can explain when a moral rule becomes the primary motive for behavior. We argue that moral integrity is achieved when a person acts on the basis of an internal moral system of principles, emotions and motives and provide an account of the way that it develops during a person’s interaction with the environment.
Keywords:Self-determination theory  moral integrity  cognitive consistency  morality  emotional integration
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号