A comparison of generalizability theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in an analysis of college sophomore writing |
| |
Authors: | Richard R Sudweeks Suzanne Reeve William S Bradshaw |
| |
Institution: | aDepartment of Instructional Psychology and Technology, 150 MCKB, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA;bDepartment of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University, USA;cDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, USA |
| |
Abstract: | A pilot study was conducted to evaluate and improve the rating procedure proposed for use in a research effort designed to assess the essay writing ability of college sophomores.Generalizability theory and the Many-Facet Rasch Model were each used to (a) estimate potential sources of error in the rating, (b) to obtain reliability estimates, and (c) to make recommendations for improving the rating process. Variance due to Task (writing prompt) and the Person-by-Task interaction were high while the variance attributable to Raters and Occasion was low. Twenty-two percent of the variability in the ratings was unexplained. The common and unique features of generalizability theory and the Many-Facet Rasch Model are described, and the advantages and disadvantages of each are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | Writing assessment Reliability of essay ratings Generalizability theory Many-Facet Rasch Model |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|