首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论模糊逻辑的有效性
引用本文:夏世英. 论模糊逻辑的有效性[J]. 凯里学院学报, 2011, 29(4). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9329.2011.04.28
作者姓名:夏世英
作者单位:贵州大学人文学院,贵州,贵阳,550025
基金项目:贵州大学研究生创新基金资助(项目编号:校研人文2011005)
摘    要:为了符合经典有效性标准,我国学者王国俊教授和婓道武教授分别构造了模糊形式演绎系统L*和模糊谓词一阶形式系统K*,这反驳了模糊逻辑缺乏逻辑基础的谬论。然而随着现代科学日益进步和逻辑学分支学科的不断发展,经典逻辑过于狭隘的非此即彼的模式及其有效性标准显得越来越过时了。非形式逻辑通过对经典有效性标准的限制和修改,已形成归纳有效性、实质有效性等另类的有效性概念。模糊逻辑用发展了的有效性标准来评估更能体现其理论存在的价值和自身特点。

关 键 词:模糊逻辑  有效性标准  经典有效性  归纳有效性  实质有效性  

On the Validity in Fuzzy Logic
XIA Shi-ying. On the Validity in Fuzzy Logic[J]. Journal of Southeast Guizhou National Teachers College, 2011, 29(4). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9329.2011.04.28
Authors:XIA Shi-ying
Affiliation:XIA Shi-ying(Humanties College of Guizhou University,Guiyang,550025,China)
Abstract:In order to meet the classical validity criteria,Prof.Wang Guo-jun and Prof.Fei Dao-wu constructed fuzzy formal deductive system L and fuzzy predicate first-order formal system K,which refuted the fallacy that fuzzy logic lacked the logic basis.However,with the advance of modern science and the continuous development of logic branches,classical logic and its validity criteria has become increasingly outdated.Through modifying and limiting the validity criteria,non-formal logic has formed alternative concept...
Keywords:fuzzy logic  validity criteria  classic validity  inductive validity  substantive validity  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号