基于引证数据的单篇论文学术生命力研究

[目的/意义]学术论文影响力评价是当前科学评价研究的重点。对单篇论文学术生命力进行研究,有助于全面分析学术论文引证数据的特征,发现学术论文的生命起始、活跃期、持续性等特征规律,为基于引证数据动态评价学术论文影响力打下基础。[方法/过程]引证数据不仅包含了直接引证数据还包括间接引证数据。该研究以Altmetrics主题论文为研究对象,采集其历年的引证文献数据(直接引证数据)和二级引证文献数据(间接引证数据),并分别从学术论文的响应时间(用于量化生命力的起始)、阶段重要性(用于量化生命力的活跃期)、阶段持续性(用于量化生命力的老化)等三个方面对学术论文的学术生命力进行探讨。[结果/结论]研究结果发现:Altmetrics是当前评价研究关注的热点,其学术论文的学术生命力起始较早;Altmetrics学术论文引证文献和二级引证文献的生命力活跃期有所差异。在量化学术论文生命力活跃期时,以学术论文引证文献测度值最佳;学术论文的生命力老化随时间具有变化性。

Research on the Academic Vitality of Single Paper Based on Citation Data

[Purpose/Significance]The evaluation of the academic papers'influence is the focus of current scientific evaluation research.The research on the academic vitality of single paper is helpful to comprehensively analyze the characteristics of citation data,and find out the characteristics of life initiation,active period and persistence of academic papers.This will lay a foundation for dynamic evaluation of the academic papers'influence based on citation data.[Method/Process]However,citation data not only includes direct citation data,but also includes indirect citation data.Therefore,this study takes Altmetrics as the research object,collects cited literature data(direct citation data)and Sub-cited literature data(indirect citation data)over the years,and discusses the academic vitality of academic papers from three aspects:the response time(used to quantify the life initiation),the importance of stages(used to quantify the active period),and the persistence of stages(used to quantify the aging).[Result/Conclusion]The research found that:Altmetrics is the focus of current evaluation research,and the academic vitality of the academic papers is earlier;the vitality period of the cited literature and sub-cited literature of Altmetrics papers is different.When quantifying the active period of academic papers,the cited literature of the academic papers is the best choice;The vitality of aging of academic papers have variability over time.