| 图形—背景理论解读英语中动结构的语义基础 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杜娟.图形—背景理论解读英语中动结构的语义基础[J].宜春学院学报,2006,28(5):153-156. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杜娟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南大学大学外语教学部,河南,开封,475001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从认知语言学的视角探讨英语中动结构的认知语义基础,运用“图形—背景理论”对中动结构及其相应的被动语态进行比较分析。本文认为两种句型结构虽都表达了被动意义,但由于某种原因1)即使图形相同,充当的角色也不同;2)背景不同,凸显程度及其所起作用亦不同;3)后景的凸显程度也不同这三种情形而导致两种句型结构的语义并不相同。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中动结构 认知 图形—背景理论 后景 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-380X（2006）05-0153-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-05-31 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年5月31日 |
Semantic Foundation of Middle Construction in English from the Perspective of Figure-ground Theory |
| |
| DU Juan.Semantic Foundation of Middle Construction in English from the Perspective of Figure-ground Theory[J].Journal of Yichun University,2006,28(5):153-156. |
| |
| Authors: | DU Juan |
| |
| Institution: | College English Department, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The present study is an exploration of the middle construction from the perspective of cognitive linguistics.It contrasts the middle construction with its corresponding passive construction by using the figure-ground theory.It is observed that,although both of them can express the passive meaning,the two constructions have different semantic meanings in view of the fact that 1) although they have the same figure,the roles of the figure are different;2) they have different grounds and the salience of the grounds is also different;3) the salience of the setting is different. |
| |
| Keywords: | middle construction cognitive figure-ground theory setting |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
