首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

墨子与荀子文艺观之比较
引用本文:徐霞.墨子与荀子文艺观之比较[J].沙洋师范高等专科学校学报,2007,8(6):39-41.
作者姓名:徐霞
作者单位:徐州师范大学,文学院,江苏,徐州,221116
摘    要:墨子和荀子分别代表墨家和儒家学派展开了关于文艺思想的论争,其文艺观的不同体现了政治观念和阶级地位的尖锐对立。墨子坚持"非乐"观点,宣扬文艺无用论,代表小生产者的利益。荀子坚持以乐辅礼、教化世人的"倡乐"观点,宣扬文艺审美功用论,代表地主阶层的长远利益。后世儒家怨而不怒、温柔敦厚的诗教中就有荀子学说的影子。

关 键 词:墨子  非乐  文艺无用论  荀子  倡乐  文艺审美功用论
文章编号:1672-0768(2007)06-0039-03
修稿时间:2007-08-26

Comparison of Aesthetic Opinions of Mo - zi and Xun - zi
XU Xia.Comparison of Aesthetic Opinions of Mo - zi and Xun - zi[J].Journal of Shayang Teachers College,2007,8(6):39-41.
Authors:XU Xia
Institution:Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116
Abstract:Mo-zi and Xun-zi stand for Mojia and the Confucianists School differently in the pre-Qin days launch confrontation of literary and artistic ideas.Their differences of views embody antithesises sharply of political ideas and class position.Mozi insisted on "opposing music".He who stands for benefits of small producer advercates that literature and art was of no use.Xun-zi persists in "advocating music",that is opinion of promoting rules by music and enlightening people.He who standsfor long-term benefits of the landlord class advercated that literature and art was aesthetic.Doctrine of the Confucianists of Later ages included sign of intension of Xun-zi.
Keywords:Mo-zi  opposing music  literature and art is useless  Xun-zi  advocating music  literature and art is aesthetic
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号