首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Education savings plans,matching contributions,and household financial allocations: Evidence from a Canadian reform
Institution:1. Social Analysis and Modelling Division, Statistics Canada, 100 Tunney’s Pasture Driveway, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0T6, Canada;2. Department of Economics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 230 Elizabeth Avenue, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 1T5, Canada;1. Department of Ag. Economics and Economics, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States;2. Department of Economics, Finance and Legal Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, United States;3. School of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University;4. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA);1. Department of Economics, Lerner College of Business and Economics, University of Delaware and NBER, 419 Purnell Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USA;2. Department of Economics, Wellesley College, USA;3. Department of Economics, Reed College, USA;1. Department of Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States;2. NBER, Cambridge, MA, United States;3. IZA, Bonn, Germany;4. School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington DC, United States;5. Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States
Abstract:Despite a large literature that investigates the effects of education savings plans on schooling outcomes, much less is known about how parents finance this saving and how it affects other household spending, including spending broadly related to child-rearing. To provide new insights on this issue, this paper estimates the spillover effects of contributions to an education savings plan on household spending and retirement saving behavior in Canada. The analysis uses a cross-sectional, nationally-representative household expenditures survey (N = 28,978) and, in an instrumental variables design, exploits policy-induced variation in education saving resulting from changes in federal matching contributions for low-income and middle-income households. The analysis finds that education saving has little effect on total household expenditures, donations, and home investments, and crowds in retirement saving among households with strictly positive net contributions in both types of saving vehicles. Only out-of-house childcare expenditures decrease as a result of education saving, suggesting that households substitute between educational investments and current spending on other child-rearing commodities. However, the dollar value of this substitution is small. These findings offer new insights into how households finance education saving for their children and suggest that different types of tax-preferred saving vehicles may be complementary rather than substitutes.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号