首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Explaining Variation in Findings From Efficacy and Effectiveness Studies for English Reading Interventions for English Learners
Authors:Christopher D Barr  Colleen K Reutebuch  Coleen D Carlson  Sharon Vaughn  David J Francis
Institution:1. Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA;2. The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Abstract:Beginning in 2002, researchers developed, implemented, and evaluated the efficacy of an English reading intervention for first-grade English learners using multiple randomized control trials (RCTs). As a result of this efficacy work, researchers successfully competed for an IES Goal 4 effectiveness study using the same intervention. Unlike the efficacy studies, the findings from the effectiveness study begun in 2011 did not yield significant differences in favor of the treatment. We investigated the identification and pre-intervention performance levels of students in efficacy and effectiveness RCT studies and provide data and compare samples from these studies as one means of explaining variation in findings. Findings indicate that pre-intervention performance levels are higher for students in effectiveness RCT studies. This article serves as an exemplar for other effectiveness studies that may not replicate findings from previous efficacy trials.
Keywords:program evaluation  equating  effectiveness study
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号