Reconciling Political and Economic Goals in the Net Neutrality Debate |
| |
Authors: | Johannes M. Bauer Jonathan A. Obar |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Telecommunication, Information Studies and Media , Michigan State University , East Lansing , Michigan , USA;2. Faculty of Information , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada;3. Quello Center for Telecommunication Management and Law , Michigan State University , East Lansing , Michigan , USA |
| |
Abstract: | The net neutrality debate is one of several sites of struggles to adapt and redefine rights and obligations of stakeholders in the Internet-centric communications system. Its outcomes will shape the future of the Internet and influence the level and distribution of its benefits. We identify key values that drive the net neutrality discussion and examine the governance mechanisms proposed to achieve these objectives. We find that there is no single policy instrument that allows realization of the range of valued political and economic objectives simultaneously. Contrary to some of the claims advanced in the current debate, safeguarding multiple goals requires a combination of instruments that will likely involve government and nongovernment measures. Furthermore, promoting goals such as the freedom of speech, political participation, investment, and innovation calls for complementary policies. |
| |
Keywords: | free speech innovation Internet investment neutrality openness |
|
|