首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

蕴涵刍议
引用本文:胡泽洪. 蕴涵刍议[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 5(5): 1-6
作者姓名:胡泽洪
作者单位:华南师范大学政治与行政学院,广东,广州,510631
基金项目:广东省高校人文社科重点研究课题(批准号:052D720001)的资助
摘    要:实质蕴涵与否定、合取、析取、等值等其他逻辑联结词一样, 其实质是对自然语言中复句的关联词所进行的合理的逻辑抽象, 所谓的&;#1048577; 实质蕴涵怪论&;#1048577;其实并不怪, 它是人们要求实质蕴涵反映条件联系中除真假联系之外的内容、意义方面的联系, 从而作了错误的解读所造成的; 作为一种特殊的条件语句, 在反事实条件句与实质蕴涵的关系问题上, 在反事实条件句与一般性条件句的区分上, 还有很多地方需要进一步探索。

关 键 词:实质蕴涵')"  >实质蕴涵, 实质蕴涵怪论,')"  > 反事实条件句,
文章编号:1000-5455(2006)05-0001-06
收稿时间:2006-08-10
修稿时间:2006-08-10

On Implication
HU Ze-hong. On Implication[J]. Journal of South China Normal University(Social Science Edition), 2006, 5(5): 1-6
Authors:HU Ze-hong
Abstract:Material implication,like other connectives such as negation,conjunction,disjunction and equivalence,is the logical abstraction from conjunctions of compound sentences in natural languages.The so-called paradox of material implication is not actually that odd since it is caused by some kind of misunderstanding when people require material implication expressions not only the truth properties but contents and meanings as well in conditions.As regards material implication,such as a particular expression of condition,some further studies are needed to explore the relations between anti-fact conditions and material implications,and the distinction between anti-fact conditions and ordinary conditions.
Keywords:material implication  paradox of material implication  anti-fact conditions  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号