PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development |
| |
Authors: | Kristina Edström Anette Kolmos |
| |
Institution: | 1. School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Swedenkristina@kth.se;3. School of Education and Communication in Engineering Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden;4. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark |
| |
Abstract: | This paper compares two models for reforming engineering education, problem/project-based learning (PBL), and conceive–design–implement–operate (CDIO), identifying and explaining similarities and differences. PBL and CDIO are defined and contrasted in terms of their history, community, definitions, curriculum design, relation to disciplines, engineering projects, and change strategy. The structured comparison is intended as an introduction for learning about any of these models. It also invites reflection to support the understanding and evolution of PBL and CDIO, and indicates specifically what the communities can learn from each other. It is noted that while the two approaches share many underlying values, they only partially overlap as strategies for educational reform. The conclusions are that practitioners have much to learn from each other's experiences through a dialogue between the communities, and that PBL and CDIO can play compatible and mutually reinforcing roles, and thus can be fruitfully combined to reform engineering education. |
| |
Keywords: | CDIO problem-based learning project-based learning PBL educational development curriculum development change strategy |
|
|