Academics’ views on publishing refereed works: A content analysis |
| |
Authors: | Brian C Hemmings Peter Rushbrook and Erica Smith |
| |
Institution: | (1) School of Education, Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Survey research was carried out with academics (N=205), from a large regional Australian university, to explore their views about publishing or not publishing in refereed
sources and their perceived worth of this activity. Several open-ended questions were included in the survey to elicit information
about the factors that either encourage or discourage these academics from publishing. Additionally, questions were posed
to allow the respondents to discuss ways that the University could further support them in their endeavour to produce at least
some or more scholarly publications. The responses to these questions were content analysed to discover key categories and
frequencies were calculated on the most salient categories. The results of this analysis are reported and comparisons are
made on the responses of male and female academics. The implications of the results for higher educational practice are considered. |
| |
Keywords: | academic output gender peer review publish or perish issues publishing |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |