| 关于苍术植物的学名问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石铸. 关于苍术植物的学名问题[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报, 1981, 19(3): 318-322 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石铸 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (中国科学院植物研究所) |
| |
| 摘 要： | This paper is the documentation of specimens and literature reffered to Atracty-lodes lancea (Thunb.) DC. etc. As a result, it is found that, in taxonomy of the genusAtractylodes, what represcents by four long-established names, i. e. Atractylodes lancea(Thunb.) DC., A. ovata (Thunb.) DC., A. chinensis (Bunge) Koidz. and A. lyrataSieb. et Zucc., in fact, is the one and same species. According to the law of priority innomenclature, the first name should be given to Chinese drug “Cangzhu”, while theother three names have to be treated as its synonyms.
|
On the nomenclature of Chinese drug “Cangzhu” |
| |
| Shih Chu. On the nomenclature of Chinese drug “Cangzhu”[J]. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1981, 19(3): 318-322 |
| |
| Authors: | Shih Chu |
| |
| Affiliation: | (Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica) |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper is the documentation of specimens and literature reffered to Atracty-lodes lancea (Thunb.) DC. etc. As a result, it is found that, in taxonomy of the genusAtractylodes, what represcents by four long-established names, i. e. Atractylodes lancea(Thunb.) DC., A. ovata (Thunb.) DC., A. chinensis (Bunge) Koidz. and A. lyrataSieb. et Zucc., in fact, is the one and same species. According to the law of priority innomenclature, the first name should be given to Chinese drug “Cangzhu”, while theother three names have to be treated as its synonyms. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院研究生院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国科学院研究生院学报》下载全文 |
|
