首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

高等教育督导评估:内涵特征、内在冲突和路径选择
引用本文:周文辉,曹镇玺.高等教育督导评估:内涵特征、内在冲突和路径选择[J].江苏高教,2019(5):28-34.
作者姓名:周文辉  曹镇玺
作者单位:《学位与研究生教育》杂志社,北京100081;北京理工大学研究生教育研究中心,北京100081;北京理工大学人文与社会科学学院,北京,100081
摘    要:我国教育督导制度在不同历史时期有不同的内涵,主要体现在机构的独立性、范围的延伸性和职能的多元性三方面,构成了高等教育督导的制度实践基础,形成了由"督导"向"评估"形式转变的内涵特征。高等教育督导评估是一个兼具教育治理权利和教育发展逻辑的概念,制度构建过程中始终存在职能性、方式性、专业性和导向性的内在冲突,需要从职能的应然性出发,在消解冲突的同时进行全面性和整体性的制度构想。

关 键 词:督导评估  督导目标  督导制度  督导机构

Higher Education Supervision and Evaluation:Connotation Characteristics,Internal Conflicts and Path Selection
Zhou Wenhui,Cao Zhenxi.Higher Education Supervision and Evaluation:Connotation Characteristics,Internal Conflicts and Path Selection[J].Jiangsu Higher Education,2019(5):28-34.
Authors:Zhou Wenhui  Cao Zhenxi
Abstract:China’s education supervision system has different connotations in different historical periods.These connotation differences are mainly reflected in the independence of institutions,the extension of scope and the pluralistic functions,which constitute the practical basis of the system of higher education supervision.A transformation from"supervision"to"evaluation"has become the connotative characteristic of China’s education supervision system.The supervision and evaluation of higher education is a concept that concerns both the right of educational governance and the logic of educational development.In the process of system construction,there is always the inherent conflict of function,mode,professionalism and orientation.It is necessary to map out a system of comprehensiveness and integrality while resolving conflicts from the deserved nature of function.
Keywords:supervision and evaluation  connotative characteristics  internal conflict  path selection
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号