| 刑事诉讼的证明标准 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐晓峰. 刑事诉讼的证明标准[J]. 安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2009, 28(11): 30-34 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐晓峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽省人力资源和社会保障厅,安徽,合肥,230061 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑事诉讼的证明标准是指法律规定的公安司法机关作出有罪认定所要达到的证明程度。英美法系的＂排除合理怀疑＂与大陆法系的＂自由心证＂标准,是一个标准的两种表述。我国刑事诉讼证明的客观事实标准存在忽视甚至否认证明标准的主观性、缺乏可操作性等弊端。我国刑事诉讼的证明标准要体现诉讼的阶段性,针对不同的证明对象、不同的证明主体采取不同的证明要求。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刑事诉讼 证明标准 理论模式 完善 |
Proof Standard in Criminal Action |
| |
| TANG Xiao-feng. Proof Standard in Criminal Action[J]. Journal of Anqing Teachers College(Social Science Edition), 2009, 28(11): 30-34 |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Xiao-feng |
| |
| Affiliation: | TANG Xiao -feng (Department of Human Resources and Social Security of Anhui Province, Hefei 230061, Anhui, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The proof standard of criminal action refers to the legally required proof degree that the public security and judicial authority offers to confirm certain guilt.Anglo-American legal system's "beyond reasonable doubt" and the "free evaluation of evidence" standard of the civil law of are two kinds of expressions of one standard.The objective facts standards proved by China's criminal action possess several disadvantages as neglecting or even denying the subjectivity of proof standard and lacking of operability.China's proof standard in criminal action should reflect the stage of action and take different proof requirements according to different objects and main bodies. |
| |
| Keywords: | criminal action proof standard theoretical model improve |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
