首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论进一步完善我国违约金制度
引用本文:郭丹云,向东,兰志刚.论进一步完善我国违约金制度[J].唐山学院学报,2007,20(1):74-76,81.
作者姓名:郭丹云  向东  兰志刚
作者单位:1. 河北理工大学,文法学院,法学系,河北,唐山,063009
2. 唐山市公交公司,河北,唐山,063000
基金项目:河北理工大学校科研和教改项目
摘    要:违约金诞生于罗马法,至今理论界仍存在很大分歧,这集中表现在两大法系对惩罚性违约金的态度上。我国合同法第114条对违约金性质做了专门规定,但在理论上依然有一些问题引发争论。随着我国与世界各国贸易的迅猛发展,应借鉴两大法系的经验,明确我国违约金的性质,在对外贸易中尽量避免使用“罚金”一词。

关 键 词:违约金  惩罚性  赔偿性
文章编号:1672-349X(2007)01-0074-03
收稿时间:2006-09-02
修稿时间:2006年9月2日

Perfecting Chinese Liquidated Damage System
GUO Dan-yun,XIANG Dong,LAN Zhi-gang.Perfecting Chinese Liquidated Damage System[J].Journal of Tangshan College,2007,20(1):74-76,81.
Authors:GUO Dan-yun  XIANG Dong  LAN Zhi-gang
Abstract:Liquidated damages for breach of contract originated from Roman Law.But great differences are still existing in academic circle till now,especially the attitudes toward punitivel clauses of the Continental Law and the Common Law.Concrete regulations are made regarding liquidated damages for breach of contract in article 114 of PRC Contract Law 1999.But many issues are still controversial in theory.With the development of the trade between China and other nations,It is necessary for us to learn from foreign experience,give an accurate definition of the nature of liquidated damages for breach of contract and to avoid using the word "penalty".
Keywords:liquidated damages for breach of contract  punitiveness  compensativeness
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号