| 论北京奥运会仲裁的法律问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张春良.论北京奥运会仲裁的法律问题[J].体育科学,2007,27(9):86-91. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张春良 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学,经贸法学院,重庆,400031 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《奥林匹克宪章》第74条建构出奥运会赛事争议的消解框架,该方案的核心特征是国际体育仲裁院的独家管辖与裁断。国际体育仲裁院仲裁奥运会赛事争议具有垄断性、强制性、透明性、悬浮性、极速性和竞技性,此类特征造就了奥运会仲裁机制的非常风格,同时,也对承办国法制环境带来冲击。如何应对2008年第29届奥运会对中国法制可能造成的影响,缔约、协调与礼让似乎是北京别无选择,但并非不是上佳选择的对治方案。
|
| 关 键 词： | 奥运会 29届 体育 仲裁 法律 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-677X（2007）09-0086-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-05-14 |
Discussion on Legal Issues of Olympic Games Arbitration in Beijing |
| |
| ZHANG Chun-liang.Discussion on Legal Issues of Olympic Games Arbitration in Beijing[J].China Sport Science,2007,27(9):86-91. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Chun-liang |
| |
| Institution: | Economic and Trade Law School of Southwest University of Political Science and Law;Chongqing 400031;China. |
| |
| Abstract: | The article 74 of Olympic Charter builds up a system to resolve sports disputes in O- lympic Games,and the resolution system is critically characterized by the exclusive jurisdiction and heating of Court of Arbitration for Sport(CAS).CAS arbitrates the sports disputes exclu- sively,mandatorily,transparently,floatingly speedily and sports-related,and so is unusual to the other resolution ways.Those unusual merits bring impacts on the hosting countries' legal systems.The sole but not bad choose for Beijing is to agree with International Olympic Com- mittee,legally adapt or respectfully concede to CAS arbitration rules. |
| |
| Keywords: | Olympic Games arbitration CAS China's response |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
