| 学者评价期刊与引文评价期刊异同之思考——以史学学术期刊评价为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 叶继元. 学者评价期刊与引文评价期刊异同之思考——以史学学术期刊评价为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2008, 34(4) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 叶继元 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学信息管理系,210093 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金重大项目建立与完善哲学社会科学评价体系( |
| |
| 摘 要： | 学者评价期刊与引文评价期刊,各有其优点和局限性,二者有不同和相同之处。将近期史学学者评价史学期刊的结果与CSSCI引文评价的结果对比,二者除具有一定的正相关性外,还具有不同的评价方法和结果,引文评价结果可供学者评价参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术期刊评价 学者评价 引文评价 史学期刊评价 |
A Comparative Study of Evaluation of Periodicals by Scholars and by Citation Indexes |
| |
| Ye Jiyuan. A Comparative Study of Evaluation of Periodicals by Scholars and by Citation Indexes[J]. Journal of Library Science In China, 2008, 34(4) |
| |
| Authors: | Ye Jiyuan |
| |
| Abstract: | Both evaluation of periodicals by scholars and evaluation of periodicals by citation indexes have their own advantages and limitations. The author compares recent evaluations of periodicals in history by history scholars and by CSSCI citation indexes, and finds that they have certain correlation elements and different evaluation methodologies and results. The evaluation by citation indexes can be used by scholars as a reference tool. |
| |
| Keywords: | Evaluation of academic periodicals. Evaluation by scholars. Evaluation by citation indexes. Evaluation of periodicals in history. |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国图书馆学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国图书馆学报》下载全文 |
