| 读诗随笔 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张锡厚.读诗随笔[J].河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,28(1):84-87. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张锡厚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国社会科学院,文研所,北京,100732 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《敦煌诗集残卷辑考》曾受到学界和唐诗研究者的广泛关注和赞誉，但辑考者忽略了整理敦煌诗歌最基础的文字要求，在录校文字时或审慎不周，或曲解诗意，抑或未加考辨，使某些明白易懂的诗句被录校得面目全非，如“李陵台”写作“高□台”，“汗马”写成“汀马”，“平原客”写作“平桌茖”，“诸佛”写为“论佛”，“奉佛”为“来佛”等等。
|
| 关 键 词： | <敦煌诗集残卷辑考>文字录校 疏误 核查原卷 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5587(2005)01-0084-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年8月25日 |
Miscellanies |
| |
| ZHANG Xi-hou.Miscellanies[J].Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science),2005,28(1):84-87. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Xi-hou |
| |
| Abstract: | Whereas An Archaeological Study of Dunhuang Poetry has attracted scholars and researchers of Tang poems, the author of the paper, however, discovers quite a few kinds of mistakes in the work due to carelessness, misunderstanding, or failure to attest. In effect, what should be easy to understand has become confusing. They spread all over the book: Lilingtai is misspelled as Gao__tai, Hanma as Tingma, Pingyuanke as Pingzhuoke, Zhufo as Lunfo, Fengfo as Laifo, among others. |
| |
| Keywords: | An Archaeological Study of Dunhuang Poetry typing and proofreading mistake checking of the original |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
