首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

大学学术不端行为问责:内涵特征、依据指向以及逻辑构架
引用本文:陈亮. 大学学术不端行为问责:内涵特征、依据指向以及逻辑构架[J]. 高校教育管理, 2020, 14(2): 85-96
作者姓名:陈亮
作者单位:陕西师范大学教育学院,陕西西安710062
基金项目:2020年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“以共治求善治:学术共同体治理学术不端的共生交往机制研究”
摘    要:大学学术不端行为问责作为新时代加快推进学术治理能力现代化的关键举措,是一种内省、内生性保障学术自由向善发展的规制方式。大学学术不端行为问责不同于一般意义上的行政问责,其具有惩罚性、报应性、互动性与救济性等特征;伦理学依据、事实依据以及法律依据是其在实践层面的依据指向。文章在论证问责逻辑构架分析标准的基础上,基于问责主体、问责客体、问责依据、问责程序以及责任类型构建大学学术不端行为问责的内容构架,这符合学术治理所要解决现实问题的事实逻辑与价值逻辑。

关 键 词:学术不端  学术不端行为问责  内涵特征  逻辑构架  学术责任  互动规制

Accountability for academic misconduct in universities:the connotative feature,basis and logical framework
CHEN Liang. Accountability for academic misconduct in universities:the connotative feature,basis and logical framework[J]. Journal of higher Education Management, 2020, 14(2): 85-96
Authors:CHEN Liang
Affiliation:(School of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an 710062, China)
Abstract:As a key measure to speed up the modernization of academic governance in the new era,accountability for academic misconduct is an introspective and endogenous regulatory way to ensure the development of academic freedom.The accountability of academic misconduct in university is different from the general administrative accountability,and has punitive,retributive,interactive and remedial characteristics.The ethical basis,factual basis and legal basis are bases in practice.On the basis of the analysis standard of the logical framework of argumentation and accountability,the accountability subject,accountability object,accountability basis,accountability procedure and responsibility type should be the content framework of accountability for academic misconduct.This is in line with the fact logic and value logic to solve practical problems in academic governance.
Keywords:academic misconduct  accountability for academic misconduct  connotative features  logical framework  academic responsibility  interactive regulation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号