| 《文选平点》翼证一则 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 童岭. 《文选平点》翼证一则[J]. 南京师范大学文学院学报, 2004, 0(4): 179-181 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 童岭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学,中文系,江苏,南京,210093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 郭绍虞主编的《中国历代文论选》就《文赋》一句的注释对季刚先生置疑.笔者搜辑大量前贤论述资料及部分汉学家的研究,在比勘考证的基础上,为季刚先生精约的笺识作一篇翼证,同时驳郭氏之说.
|
| 关 键 词： | 黄侃 文赋 可 可谓 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-9853(2004)04-179-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-09-03 |
A Collateral Proof for Reviews on the Selected Works |
| |
| Tong Ling. A Collateral Proof for Reviews on the Selected Works[J]. Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University, 2004, 0(4): 179-181 |
| |
| Authors: | Tong Ling |
| |
| Abstract: | In his Selected Literary Theories over the Ages Guo Shaoyu questions Mr Huang Jigang on the annotation of one sentence in Wen Fu. The author of this paper has collected substantial reference materials by previous worthies and some research gains by Sinologists, and based on textual examination, comparison, and collation, comes up with a collateral proof for Mr Huang's terse and precise annotation. Guo's claim is in the meantime refuted. |
| |
| Keywords: | Huang Kan Wen Fu ke kewei |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
