| 《全芳备祖》之我见 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗桂环.《全芳备祖》之我见[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,1985,23(6):476-482. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗桂环 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “Quan Fang Bei Zu” is a compiled work mainly for folklores, poems and other literary works concerning some common plants with some botanical information in it. It is certainly not a pure botanical work, covering no more than 240 species of plants, and thus has little use as a reference book in indexing names even in a primitive sense. Therefore “Quan Fang Bei Zu” could not be considered as a botanical dictionary. Xu Wen-xuan and his co-workers’ argument that “Quan Fang Bei Zu” was the most perfect ancient botanical codes and records till then is not convincing. Actually “Tu Jing Ben Cao” is of higher value than the book under discussion from botanical point of view.
|
| 关 键 词： | 全芳备祖 商榷 |
My View on the“Quan Fang Bei Zu” |
| |
| Luo Gui-Huan.My View on the“Quan Fang Bei Zu”[J].Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,1985,23(6):476-482. |
| |
| Authors: | Luo Gui-Huan |
| |
| Abstract: | “Quan Fang Bei Zu” is a compiled work mainly for folklores, poems and other literary works concerning some common plants with some botanical information in it. It is certainly not a pure botanical work, covering no more than 240 species of plants, and thus has little use as a reference book in indexing names even in a primitive sense. Therefore “Quan Fang Bei Zu” could not be considered as a botanical dictionary. Xu Wen-xuan and his co-workers’ argument that “Quan Fang Bei Zu” was the most perfect ancient botanical codes and records till then is not convincing. Actually “Tu Jing Ben Cao” is of higher value than the book under discussion from botanical point of view. |
| |
| Keywords: | “Quan Fang Bei Zu” consultation |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院研究生院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院研究生院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
